Menu
ANTICIPATE BEFORE YOU SUBMIT

Can this project
move forward?

Regulatory intelligence connecting project data, planning context, and applicable requirements before submission — for verifiable planning decisions.

Explore the product
Conceptual representation · Does not represent data from a specific project or regulation
01 / APPLICABLE CONTEXT

One project.
All the context that gives it meaning.

Planning analysis gains solidity when the architectural proposal, the surrounding territory, and regulatory requirements are examined within a continuous and coherent relationship.

1 ProjectFootprint & Volumetry
2 Spatial PlanningZoning & Master Plan Indices
3 CadastreBoundaries & Abutments
4 Municipal RegulationsBuilding Rules
5 ConstraintsEasements & Restrictions
  1. 01
    Project DataProposal

    Dimensional and volumetric element of the architectural proposal.

  2. 02
    Source / EvidenceDocumentary Evidence

    Drawing sheet and cross-section with recorded threshold elevation.

  3. 03
    Applicable RequirementNormative Criterion

    Regulatory criterion applicable to the planning framework.

  4. 04
    Relational ConfrontationObjective Verification

    Direct confrontation between proposed dimension and normative limit.

  5. 05
    Structured OutcomeFoundation for Professional Review

    Auditable record with full traceability back to documentary source.

Invariant Decision Boundary

The system structures and verifies what is deterministic. The professional reviews, interprets, and decides.

02 / ANALYTICAL TRACEABILITY

Every verification
follows a traceable path.

The assessment establishes a direct connection between the architectural proposal, documentary evidence, and the applicable regulatory criteria — keeping the reasoning behind each conclusion transparent.

No false certainty when information is incomplete.

When required information is unavailable in the process, the record remains deliberately open for technical review.

Explore the detailed workflow
03 / Professional Audiences

For design teams.
For municipal authorities.

Objective technical support before submission and before decision — keeping professional judgment and responsibility at the centre.

Before submission

Architects & Design Teams

Preliminary verification of building volume, setbacks and planning parameters before formal submission to the municipality, supporting project review before submission.

Explore the design workflow
Before decision

Municipalities & Technical Services

Structured confrontation between project proposals and planning instruments for transparent reporting, preserving administrative discretion.

Explore the municipal workflow
04 / Professional Testing

Help us test ImoHarmonia
in real-world practice.

We are seeking professionals to help evaluate how this approach performs across real-world workflows and casework.

Participation Profile

This evaluation is relevant if you:

  • Work in project preparation or technical review
  • Regularly cross-reference fragmented regulatory sources
  • Can provide rigorous critical feedback
Validation Process

How the validation unfolds:

01Understand the context
02Evaluate the approach
03Gather feedback
No false certainty when information is incomplete.

Interpretation and decisions continue to require professional review.

I want to test ImoHarmonia Professional expression of interest