Project informationDimension 01
Planning fact
Considered project datum (footprint, height, use, massing). Has no independent probative weight without documentary provenance.
Concept of factProduct
Analysis begins in relationships.
ImoHarmonia develops a regulatory intelligence approach to support the preliminary review of projects. Project information, regulations, and evidence, with mandatory professional review.
The regulatory relationship model.
The starting point is the project within its planning context: territorial location, intended use, and applicable instruments. Preliminary assessment structures the relationships between design elements and regulatory requirements.
The model formally separates project information, the evidence substantiating it, and the technical assessment. This distinction clarifies what supports each result and where human responsibility begins.
Scope of analysis
Architectural project Territorial regulatory context
Analytical confrontation
Responsibility boundary · The outcome is not the decisionProfessional review and judgment
Administrative decision and project validation belong exclusively to human review and the competent authority.
Conceptual model; without automated process execution or approval guarantees.
Core dimensions of analysis.
Probative evidenceDimension 02
Documentary evidence
Drawings, technical specification, certificate, or topographic survey substantiating and anchoring the fact in the process.
Concept of evidenceRegulatory frameworkDimension 03
Regulatory requirement
Condition, constraint, or parameter established in legislation or municipal planning instruments in force.
Concept of requirementFormalised logicDimension 04
Computable rule
Logical, deterministic representation of a requirement. Not every regulatory requirement admits computable formalisation.
Concept of ruleResponsibility boundary and human review.
Responsibility boundary
Technical analysis supports; the decision belongs to the professional.
The proposal is to support professional review. It does not replace the professional or the competent authority, does not provide legal advice, and does not guarantee a project's approval.
The presented model describes a conceptual relationship system; it does not establish proprietary input formats or substitute formal review by competent authorities.