How it works
From information to review.
A conceptual path to understand regulatory analysis. The steps explain relationships and responsibilities; they do not demonstrate automated operation.
The analysis path.
- Territorial framework
Frame the project.
Consider territory, scope, and temporal reference before evaluating requirement applicability.
- Project elements
Identify planning facts.
Distinguish considered project data from the evidence that supports it.
- Probative support
Connect evidence.
Maintain provenance and documentary grounds associated with every fact considered.
- Regulatory framework
Substantiate requirements.
Relate each requirement to the specific norm and regulatory source in the applicable context.
- Computable criteria
Represent when possible.
Formal representation in a deterministic model is a distinct step; not all requirements admit formalisation.
- Technical evaluation
Delimit the verification.
Cross-reference facts, rules, and context. Verification is a bounded technical evaluation, not an automatic conclusion.
- Bounded synthesis
Read results and limits.
The technical result must explicitly state grounds and information gaps for the examining professional.
- Professional sovereignty
Review before deciding.
Interpretation and decisions belong to the professional and the competent authority within their statutory responsibility.
Incomplete information
A gap must
remain visible.
When required information is unavailable, the model requires the conclusion to remain open. Professional review begins by acknowledging this boundary.
This principle does not assert automated detection of missing data.
An absence does not equal zero or compliance.
System principle: uncertainty remains explicit until professional resolution.
The result is not the decision.
The proposal is to support professional review. It does not replace the professional or the competent authority, does not provide legal advice, and does not guarantee a project's approval.